Our Team
Homeopathy Network is built by practitioners and researchers who believe that quality homeopathic knowledge deserves a modern, evidence-graded home on the web. Every page on this site reflects a collaboration between clinical expertise and rigorous research methodology — two disciplines that sharpen each other and produce content we stand behind.
Our Editorial Model
We use a dual-attribution editorial model. Most content on Homeopathy Network carries two clear bylines: the writer and the clinical reviewer. This transparency lets readers know exactly who is responsible for what they are reading and who has verified its clinical accuracy.
For most condition guides and remedy overviews, the attribution reads: Written by Homeopathy Network Team | Clinically reviewed by Marco Ruggeri. This means the editorial team drafted the content using structured research processes, and Marco reviewed every clinical claim against his own practice experience and the materia medica literature before publication.
Some content carries a sole author byline. Deep clinical monographs and first-person practitioner insights are written directly by Marco Ruggeri. Evidence reviews and data-driven analyses are authored by Simone Ruggeri. In every case, the byline tells you whose voice and expertise shaped the page.
We detail the full scope of our editorial standards, sourcing methodology, and evidence grading criteria in our Editorial Policy.
Marco Ruggeri — Homeopath & Clinical Author
Marco is a practicing homeopath whose clinical work forms the backbone of Homeopathy Network's content. His role spans two dimensions: he is the primary clinical author for in-depth remedy monographs and practitioner-focused guides, and he serves as clinical reviewer for all team-authored content on the site.
His writing draws on direct practice experience. When Marco describes a remedy picture, he draws on the classical materia medica tradition — Boericke, Kent, Murphy, and others — filtered through years of working with patients. His voice is first-person, grounded, and practical: the perspective of someone who has sat across from patients presenting the symptoms he writes about.
As clinical reviewer, Marco reads every condition page and remedy overview before publication, checking claims against the source literature and flagging anything that does not reflect honest clinical reality.
Simone Ruggeri — AI Research Scientist & Research Author
Simone is an AI research scientist who designed and maintains the research infrastructure behind Homeopathy Network. His work ensures that every piece of content is traceable to its sources and that our evidence grading system operates with consistency and transparency.
Simone built the knowledge graph that maps remedy-condition relationships across multiple repertories and materia medica corpora, powered by Similia.io. This structured data layer means our content is not generated from general knowledge — it is grounded in specific, verifiable homeopathic sources. When a remedy appears on a condition page with an evidence grade, that grade reflects a defined methodology applied to real repertory and corpus data.
His authored content focuses on evidence reviews, data methodology, and research analysis — written in a precise, transparent voice that makes our process legible to readers.
How We Create Content
Our content creation process has four stages, each designed to ensure accuracy, traceability, and editorial quality.
-
Research and drafting — Content begins with structured data from our knowledge graph. AI-assisted drafting tools help us organize source material from repertories and materia medica corpora into readable prose. Every draft is anchored to specific sources, not generated from unverifiable model knowledge.
-
Clinical review — Marco reviews every draft against his practice experience and the classical homeopathic literature. He verifies remedy pictures, checks symptom descriptions for accuracy, and ensures the clinical voice is honest. Claims that cannot be substantiated are revised or removed.
-
Evidence grading — Each remedy-condition pairing receives an evidence grade (A through D) based on the breadth and depth of its sourcing. Grade A requires randomized controlled trial data. Grade C — the most common grade, and an honest one — indicates corroboration across two or more materia medica sources. We do not inflate grades, and we display them openly on every page.
-
Quality assurance — A final pass checks for consistency across the site: internal links, terminology alignment with our style guide, frontmatter validation, and adherence to our Editorial Policy. Red-team reviews periodically stress-test our content for unsupported claims, banned terminology, and editorial drift.
The result is a library of homeopathic content where every claim is traceable, every grade is earned, and every page carries a clear byline. We believe this is the standard homeopathic publishing should meet.